[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by Me. I Am Salman

here I go AGAIN repeating myself because you're too lazy to read my posts I didn't tell people to not being up Helen's past simply because it's the past. I clearly stated not to do so because a) there's a good chance she's changed b) her past can be justified c) her past has no correlation with her actions in the house. Jim on the other hand has shown no indications of changing and the things he's done are horrific and unjustifiable. so no hypocrisy on my part at all he's probably the only housemate whose past I've brung up anyway, no other housemate has done the things he's done.

anything else you wanna say

Yes, it IS hypocrisy.

Jim showed NO homophobic or racist behaviour in the house, or any violence towards women either, so your logic is completely flawed...

And how is being a prozzie & selling your story to a tabloid justified?? lol

Bless...