[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

There is very little to debate over alleged personal claims and pseudo science I am afraid

And Christmas was around before Christianity adopted it

"Christmas was around before Christianity adopted it"???? Do you mean that a pagan festival in December was around before Christianity adopted it? Christmas or Christ's Mass means a celebration of Christ's birthday and although the actual date on which we celebrate is not accurate and has pagan and secular origins, a celebration of Christ's birthday, is just that; a celebration of Christ's birthday - as distinct from a celebration of the actual time of year.

You will be telling me next that the Shroud of Turin was manufactured by Da Vinci - even though it was in existence 300 years before he was born.

As for; "alleged personal claims..." my claims are substantiated by hard corroborating evidence from eye-witnesses and contemporaries, some of who do not believe in anything 'paranormal' but cannot deny what they did witness as fact. Truthful people in other words.

"Pseudo science"? I don't really understand. Oh you mean pseudo science as in George Zweigt's 1964 proposal for the existence of 'quarks' - the subatomic particles that combine to form all matter? The theory which saw him ridiculed and branded a 'charlatan' by the Scientific Establishment? The very same Establishment which just 5 years later embraced the award of the Nobel prize in Physics to one of Zweigt's contemporaries for the identical theory?

Or Ludwig Boltzmann who was so ridiculed and ostracised for his proposal to that atoms existed, that he hung himself?

There are numerous other examples of pseudo science becoming accepted science.