Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia
That's a lot of buts and what ifs TS. And a bit of an attack on our security services who ARE great at their jobs. Thing is, we'll never know the workings of what went on with this man and MI5. That's why they're called the secret service.
It surprises me slightly that more onus is being given to a terrorist's family's feelings when so many other families have been left bereft in the most horrible way by their son's actions. I am not of the mind that they are involved in terrorism necessarily, but I am pro-them being questioned... which is what a lot of people on here seem to be against as they view them as victims. And I'd be surprised if that is either happening right now, or has already happened. And not just his family, all his friends too.
|
Not against them being questioned like any family whose had someone commit a grave crime, I am against them being treated like criminals based on nothing more than speculation though. If there's evidence of wrongdoing then go to town on them otherwise it's guilt by association.
Threaded Mode