[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

I'm going to enjoy this.

Hello Thrice, so what part of Gay adoption is child abuse? Thats what I really want to know, what part of children being scared, hurt, injured and tormented physically and mentally is comparable to putting them in a house with two loving parents?

Do you think a child having no mum is healthy? Would you deliberately put a child into such a situation?

I keep hearing that everyone has the right to have children. The fact is that that is a selfish view. Children have the right to a mother.

[AProducer'sWetDream]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Do you think a child having no mum is healthy? Would you deliberately put a child into such a situation?

I keep hearing that everyone has the right to have children. The fact is that that is a selfish view. Children have the right to a mother.

But the children in care who would be adopted have no parents. It is selfish of you to deny children a loving home.

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Do you think a child having no mum is healthy? Would you deliberately put a child into such a situation?

I keep hearing that everyone has the right to have children. The fact is that that is a selfish view. Children have the right to a mother.

Its certainly not unhealthy? What about all those hundreds of people who have abusive mothers who beat up their children? Two dads and two mums can do just as good as a job as a man and a woman, its the person inside not the persons identity.

Its not a selfish view at all, providing people have one loving parent, that is fine for me.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

Its certainly not unhealthy? What about all those hundreds of people who have abusive mothers who beat up their children? Two dads and two mums can do just as good as a job as a man and a woman, its the person inside not the persons identity.

Its not a selfish view at all, providing people have one loving parent, that is fine for me.

Children need a mother. That is why nature has seen women giving birth to children and nursing them for the last 100,000 years.

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Children need a mother. That is why nature has seen women giving birth to children and nursing them for the last 100,000 years.

Children need a mother to be born congratulations, doesn't mean that they need a mother and a father does it? I've never felt appreciated with my Dad, I've coped extremely well with one loving parent, so why should a child be denied of loving parents just because they didn't squeeze them out of their fanny? (Obviously lesbians want to adopt too and should be allowed to, more loving parents are what we should be encouraging.)