[MB.]

Originally Posted by AarynGriesfan

I am all for woman power but Hannah was a mess out there. But I do think it was a mistake not to vote out David at 5. Because if he wins f4 immunity he wins the game. Plus you have to rely on Ken voting out his best friend which he had been unwilling to do all game long. Way to big of a risk to take. In the end it worked out but I think it was the wrong way to go about it.

I'll never understand basing something like that on hypotheticals in Survivor - like, you could say not taking out Chris pre-merge was a mistake because he could have gone on an immunity run until the end. He didn't, and saying it doesn't make it valid nor does it discredit anyone still in the game, aka Hannah (which is why this jury was a ****ing dumb jury)

(ps Troy I love you but your opinions are good enough that you don't have to take your posts from CTS)