| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Quote:
What experts on Brexit - there weren't any. |
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
Quote:
There were plenty of experts of all walks of life who were critical of Brexit, once again you're proving me correct because you obviously didn't pay attention to what the experts were saying in regards to Brexit when it isn't something you want to hear. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Quote:
There were 'experts' on both sides in the Brexit debate so at the end of the day it comes down to opinion and who you agree with. There is no defined right or wrong in this. Personally I am still firmly of the opinion that long term Brexit and independence from Europe and all its controlling rules and regulations will be good for Britain. Despite your protestations you have proved nothing. Last edited by Brillopad; 12-03-2017 at 12:15 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Oh? Last post you said this 'What experts on Brexit - there weren't any.' and now you are saying there were experts on both sides? What's the truth? Do you even know? |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Quote:
There you go with your aggressive sexist put-downs. I'm not sensitive to them but will point out double standards when I see them especially when directed at me. |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
Quote:
As for the experts point, it was only the remain side that had spoken out about experts simply because most of them thought that Brexit was a bad idea. Your whole generic statement which is basically a desperate attempt to regain footing doesn't change the fact that the Remain camp encouraged voters to disregard experts and their research because it didn't suit their agenda. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Quote:
Why would I need to regain footing in this argument - as far as I can see you haven't provided any arguments that would require any loss of footing in any argument against your arguments. You have an agenda, I have an agenda, we all have agendas - and we all argue accordingly. So just a pointless jibe that proves nothing. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|