Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-10-2017, 03:58 PM #1
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
OK so we're getting there.

HOW did she know exactly what she was doing?

Because she knew that the imagery of a black woman changing to a white woman would set people off.

She saw the 3 second video, she thought "hey this would be easy to twist".

She knew that it would set off thew internet.

Because it was really obvious it would and she knew it as soon as she saw the video.



Now, forgive me here, but this was a ****ing beauty vlogger, not an evil genius. A beauty vlogger saw the obvious twist exploit in this video. But the ad execs quality control didn't consider it for a second. Hmmmm. Dove are pretending to be shocked. Hmmmm. Everyone else is claiming that they have no idea how this has happened. HHHhhhmmmm.

Well darn, I guess everyone has been outsmarted. By a beauty vlogger. ... .... .......
But that's making it the ad makers fault. Which it shouldn't be.

Because I daresay you could screenshot any advert/campaign/TV show/scene/artwork/cover and take it out of the context of its original presentation to make it look like something it isn't.

Again, I don't think people like that should be pandered to.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 04:03 PM #2
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
But that's making it the ad makers fault. Which it shouldn't be.

Because I daresay you could screenshot any advert/campaign/TV show/scene/artwork/cover and take it out of the context of its original presentation to make it look like something it isn't.

Again, I don't think people like that should be pandered to.
Well I don't either, which is why I said (in first post) that I would be fine with it if Dove had said that they expected certain people to try to twist the message, but that they believe in their positive message and wouldn't let internet loons dictate their actions.

My issue is with the idea that it never crossed their minds at all. It's just... BS. It did. It must have.
user104658 is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 04:05 PM #3
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
Well I don't either, which is why I said (in first post) that I would be fine with it if Dove had said that they expected certain people to try to twist the message, but that they believe in their positive message and wouldn't let internet loons dictate their actions.

My issue is with the idea that it never crossed their minds at all. It's just... BS. It did. It must have.
I think by that they obviously mean it didn't cross their minds in the creation of the ad (ie. it wasn't at all a part of their intention).

Whether they predicted loons would twist their message is neither here nor there really. Admitting "yeah, actually we thought someone might take it out of context and make it racist" wouldn't achieve much IMO.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 04:08 PM #4
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
I think by that they obviously mean it didn't cross their minds in the creation of the ad (ie. it wasn't at all a part of their intention).

Whether they predicted loons would twist their message is neither here nor there really. Admitting "yeah, actually we thought someone might take it out of context and make it racist" wouldn't achieve much IMO.
So we go on with companies pretending to be surprised by things they aren't surprised by, and we pretend to believe that they are surprised, and then we pretend to be surprised when it turns out they weren't surprised at all, even though no one is surprised in the slightest by any of it.

I'm not playing .
user104658 is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 04:16 PM #5
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
So we go on with companies pretending to be surprised by things they aren't surprised by, and we pretend to believe that they are surprised, and then we pretend to be surprised when it turns out they weren't surprised at all, even though no one is surprised in the slightest by any of it.

I'm not playing .
Or they just tell the crazies "Racism was not and is not the intention behind the campaign" which it clearly isn't and move on?
Marsh. is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
ad, controversial, dove


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts