Quote:
Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy
I think it should be the same as IVF treatment and has to be paid for if there are no medical reasons.
India could well afford her costs but used NHS facilities anyway.
Surely medical needs should be addressed before sexual needs, if money is short isn't this something the LGBT could fund for their members (No pun intended) by starting a fund for those who need help.
By relying on a very stretched NHS service, would this be a self help idea to put forward which could benefit all.
|
Few things. Transgender has nothing to do with sexuality, or needs. This was India’s point about being grouped with LGB.
LGBT is not a union. There is no HQ. You do not pay money in every month.
Honestly, I’m shocked at some of the level of understanding here.
Threaded Mode