[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

I think it should be the same as IVF treatment and has to be paid for if there are no medical reasons.

India could well afford her costs but used NHS facilities anyway.

Surely medical needs should be addressed before sexual needs, if money is short isn't this something the LGBT could fund for their members (No pun intended) by starting a fund for those who need help.

By relying on a very stretched NHS service, would this be a self help idea to put forward which could benefit all.

Totatly agree with IVF should not be funded by the NHS and only plastic surgery after fires,crash .,cancer etc . no nose jobs ,eye lifts, boob reductions ...India stood in the garden talking about the surgeon book of fannys that he chose from ( what a load of BS ) and they fact she took over £14,000 for the NHS which could have saved lives ,when as you say he had a good job and could afford to pay

[Bluelight]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Totatly agree with IVF should not be funded by the NHS and only plastic surgery after fires,crash .,cancer etc . no nose jobs ,eye lifts, boob reductions ...India stood in the garden talking about the surgeon book of fannys that he chose from ( what a load of BS ) and they fact she took over £14,000 for the NHS which could have saved lives ,when as you say he had a good job and could afford to pay

“He”.

It did save India’s life.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Bluelight

“He”.

It did save India’s life.

India was Jonathon before the op ( We paid for) and during looking at a book which had photos of 20,000 different Mucky Marys in it