| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
Why is it so hard for them to just comply?... Do your checks and operate, if you don't you will cease to have licences granted.
Every other company in the UK has regulatory or safeguarding criteria, why are uber different? Uber has responded to Transport for London's announcement that it will not renew the company's licence to operate in the UK capital. In a statement, Uber said that banning its operations in London would, "show the world that, far from being open, London is closed to innovative companies who bring choice to consumers.” Uber vowed to challenge the ruling. It has 21 days to lodge an appeal. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bu...-a7960971.html
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
Quote:
Seems the safety thing has been blown WAY out of proportion though and it also seems that TFL are* at fault for the number of attacks by licensed drivers in the first place. *partly at fault, as the main blame lies with the rapist/person who assaulted the victims of course Quote:
Last edited by Vicky.; 22-09-2017 at 06:33 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
The fact is vetting and barring is used for a reason and regardless of whether or not it prevents attacks it prevents known predators from using the profession to trawl for victims.
How many licences are issued is not the problem, drivers are needed obviously... safe drivers.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
beyonce of waltham forest
|
****ing pisstake.
The black cabbie drivers shouldn't be charging extortionate prices A cab ride from Victoria to Waterloo, a journey of 2.5 miles, will cost the same as a ticket from London Gatwick to Rome Fiumincino booked 3 months in advance, or 22 pounds. They deserve to die out since they cannot compete. I normally support some degree of higher pricing for self employed but in this case it's simply extortionate. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
At the bottom of the article...
![]() SPONSORED RESULTS 1. Sign Up for Uber Driver 2. Uber Driver Application
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
KIZZY
FACT: TFL verified EVERY FECKING DRIVER for UBER. This is Stitch up by NO GOOD MAYOR KAHN Appeal is up to 8 weeks so UBER still LEGAL BLISS |
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
Stop shouting and swearing at me please.... A disclosure is not transferable, should you apply for a job you will have to obtain another.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
LeatherTrumpet View Post
Stay at home and save LT 80% cheaper are you pissed or SoMETHing |
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
Uber are a seriously dodgy company, and it says a lot that so many care more about the cost of a taxi than their personal safety. Seems to me different rules are applied when it personally saves a few quid.
I do agree that there is a place for a service like Uber, but it has to provide fundamental levels of protection to its customers. Uber has lost its license to operate in many cities across Europe and in the USA, so they are not being unfairly picked on. They need to revise their operating practices if they wish to continue. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
The idea that Uber would still be allowed to operate without a license to appeal the ruling is suspect. If the situation was as bad as it was made out then surely they'd have been unable to operate until the ruling was overturned.
It's a tactical move to give the Black Cab industry a boost, the safety concerns are a poor argument when Vicky's maths earlier in the thread showed that you were more at risk in a Black Cab than an uber. |
||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
||||
|
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
|
Hope the Black cab trade got a welcome boost from this, this weekend
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
I was chatting with someone about this today and they told me that its likely being dismantled because its a tax scam. The owner of Uber isn't charged VAT on his business because his business model is set up to make its drivers responsible for VAT. Because its doubtful that many if any drivers are earning enough to be VAT registered, it simply means no VAT is paid.
__________________
No longer on this site. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|