[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It annoys me that an obvious multi or pre banned member can come back on...hide behind a new name...then insult members posts they didnt get on with in the first place....it happened to me i think and it makes you feel like the forum is against you..when infact its just someone who shouldnt even be here.

I don't know which member you're talking about Parmnion but have you reported them or PMd a mod or admin with your suspicions that they might be a multi?

[Marsh.]

Wait... Brillo.... who has just tried to bait me with a condescending remark about glass houses is actually a former permabanned member?

Now that's a glass house I've never entered.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It annoys me that an obvious multi or pre banned member can come back on...hide behind a new name...then insult members posts they didnt get on with in the first place....it happened to me i think and it makes you feel like the forum is against you..when infact its just someone who shouldnt even be here.

I get you now

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

You had already replied, I saw your original reply. Then Cherie made a post complaining about me saying "it" because she had completely misunderstood part of my post. Then you edited your own post to complain about the same thing. I'm not having a go, I'm just saying... That was the exact sequence of events... The posts and edits have time stamps on them . I don't even want to argue, I'm just sick of people not calling a spade a spade.

I read it as you calling brillopad an it as well...sorry.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Withano

Is the right/left, tory/labour, remain/leave divide even relevant anymore though?

The most recently discussed threads on this section are
Toys R Us
Multi accounts
The weather
Patriotism
Snowmen
Diabetes
10p coins

I think people are still habitually agreeing and fighting with those they know to be (un)like them on the political side of things.

Hardly anybody in this thread has even responded to the OP!

Thats how I see it anyway. I had Kaz reiterate her views on the OP to me and questioning my views, despite my views on the OP being very similar to hers... Brillo came on and just disagreed with Smithy without responding herself, Cherie came on and just applauded Brillo without responding herself... Parm did the same despite Brillos post being nothing to do with the thread he created!

I'm sure there are other examples, it just seems like people are ready to disagree with those that theyre used to disagreeing with, without even reading their views, and agreeing with the same old people in every thread regardless too.

I'm featuring in more posts than Jeremy Corbyn today

[Crimson Dynamo]

so who are the perma returnees

Brillo

and who else

lets get this out

[Marsh.]

I just don't understand the point of their original account being permabanned if there is no such thing as a permaban.

Let them back if you want but allowing them back under a new username is just plain odd.

Especially as the rule on multis is still there.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

On a serious not in SD the left wing people have a far far thinner skin and get quite affronted when their pearls of wisdom get trashed. I think its down to them being younger and more idealistic?

SD.... young.


No no no stop being so ridiculous.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by smudgie

I sometimes wonder if someone who is new is actually somebody else, not someone banned, just someone that has been here a good while then wants to go incognito for some reason.
Same style of posting, knows too much about other members views etc yet only been here for a week or two.
They are very transparent or I am far too paranoid and need more meds.

This is what enspired the thread.

[Marsh.]

I wonder what inspired the thread though.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I just don't understand the point of their original account being permabanned if there is no such thing as a permaban.

Let them back if you want but allowing them back under a new username is just plain odd.

Especially as the rule on multis is still there.

I disagree, I think taking their old username out of peoples consciousness is a healthy idea.. if the Truth came back, for example, I don't think it should be under that username. He should come back, be upfront about being the Truth, claim hes changed and grown up etc, and then post under his new username with a hopefully more pleasant posting style.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

SD.... young.


No no no stop being so ridiculous.

stop getting affronted with your thin skin

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Withano

I disagree, I think taking their old username out of peoples consciousness is a healthy idea.. if the Truth came back, for example, I don't think it should be under that username. He should come back, be upfront about being the Truth, claim hes changed and grown up etc, and then post under his new username with a hopefully more pleasant posting style.

agreed, he could change it to say Womanhata123 or Bitchkiller?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

agreed, he could change it to say Womanhata123 or Bitchkiller?

🤣

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Withano

I disagree, I think taking their old username out of peoples consciousness is a healthy idea.. if the Truth came back, for example, I don't think it should be under that username. He should come back, be upfront about being the Truth, claim hes changed and grown up etc, and then post under his new username with a hopefully more pleasant posting style.

I don't agree with allowing them back full stop tbh. They were obviously perma'd for a reason.

The only time I think ok is in the case of it being several years and that person was a kid and has grown up since. Like Stacey. Banned for essentially being so childish and came back years later as an adult.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

It doesn't really matter to me, I don't particularly agree with perm banning in the first place (except spammers), but it matters in the context of this thread because it was made by Parm - who generally agrees with and supports Brillo's posts - and the thread seems to have been made for him to, I guess, "call out" people that he DOESN'T like and perhaps have them re-banned.

So mostly, I was pointing out to Parm that a member he likes / supports is actually one of the "new account" members he's complaining about in his original post.

Listen, i dont get this me and brillo thing at all....i like to think i run solo on here...made a couple of people like me enough to laugh at my crap...everyone else probably thinks im a bit if a dick...but i can live with that...

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I don't agree with allowing them back full stop tbh. They were obviously perma'd for a reason.

The only time I think ok is in the case of it being several years and that person was a kid and has grown up since. Like Stacey. Banned for essentially being so childish and came back years later as an adult.

I won't campaign for you when you get a perma

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

stop getting affronted with your thin skin

Jealous because my skin is still tight and wrinklefree?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I won't campaign for you when you get a perma

I've never done anything serious enough to warrant one.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Listen, i dont get this me and brillo thing at all....i like to think i run solo on here...made a couple of people like me enough to laugh at my crap...everyone else probably thinks im a bit if a dick...but i can live with that...

We disagree a lot of the time but I am also in this gang

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

lol, I'm talking about banned old members masquerading as new ones
and you instead try to restrict members' right to speak out based on the length of membership
there's nothing wrong with a precocious bright young member saying that an established one has been brain-farting in threads
respect must be earned, the sweetest of parmnions

Im watching you....

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

We disagree a lot of the time but I am also in this gang

Ganghanded? Look at you, your eyes lit up then.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Ganghanded? Look at you, your eyes lit up then.

I'm the leader

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I've never done anything serious enough to warrant one.

What do you think is serious enough then. Sounds like you don’t have a clue if you think permanent-banned members have necessarily done something really bad. But of course you aren’t privy to that information are you so you can only assume.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I don't know which member you're talking about Parmnion but have you reported them or PMd a mod or admin with your suspicions that they might be a multi?

No..im not feeling hard done by from the mods today so ive let them be.