Prince Andrew vs Meghan and Harry

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

he has been repeatedly asked to volunteer his time to go and help investigations and has so far not gone. His age is irrelevant.

His age is relevant to the point that a 90+ year old woman is hardly going to grab her 61 year old son by the scruff of the neck and drag him kicking and screaming in a car and take him to a police station...
The U.S say they have asked him to cooperate but it’s been denied by the Palace...he could I guess be sopaenad and if he does then we will be sure to know about it.

[Scarlett.]

Originally Posted by jet

Totally untrue. The investigation is ongoing and we still have to hear the evidence of that Griselle (or whatever her name is) woman. She may implicate Andrew and have evidence against him - we'll just have to wait and see.

Money and favours will be exchanged, and it will be buried, it always is. It's how the upper class functions.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by jet

No more than many others Ammi which you don't comment on...

Seeing you have gotten personal and are taking my post as personal against you when I would have said the same in answer to what you said to anyone...maybe don't be so ultra sensitive.
If 'really Ammi, come on' upsets you that much maybe you need to grow a thicker skin.

...my skin is the perfect thickness, Jet...your passive aggressiveness is not so perfect, though...as you can imagine if it were being aimed at you...I’d appreciate it if you don’t direct it to me at all, when it isn’t necessary or justified...

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Scarlett.

Money and favours will be exchanged, and it will be buried, it always is. It's how the upper class functions.

I agree.

Plus can anyone rational possibly really see if the USA demands his presence there.

The Queen and the government via the Home office and courts would have to agree to that.

Does anyone rational likely see any possibility of that happening.
Not a chance of it I'd say to that.

[bitontheslide]

there will have to be some very serious allegation made against Andrew before he would face any criminal charges and even then i think they would claim diplomatic immunity as he was working for the government for much of the time in question. To sum up, Andrew knows he is unlikely to face any consequences so he won't cooperate with the investigation

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

there will have to be some very serious allegation made against Andrew before he would face any criminal charges and even then i think they would claim diplomatic immunity as he was working for the government for much of the time in question. To sum up, Andrew knows he is unlikely to face any consequences so he won't cooperate with the investigation

...I would say that he was told to step back fro. Royal duties ...(...I don’t know actually if his mother asked him to or whether he made that decision himself...)...and keep a low profile ...it’s been said that he’s refused to answer questions and for a regular person, it would be a long process to extradite them to the USA...but for a a member of the royal family, I have no idea how long it would take, if it was possible at all...

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

there will have to be some very serious allegation made against Andrew before he would face any criminal charges and even then i think they would claim diplomatic immunity as he was working for the government for much of the time in question. To sum up, Andrew knows he is unlikely to face any consequences so he won't cooperate with the investigation

Puts him on par with the American ‘Diplomats wife who used Diplomatic immunity after killing that young boy....it’s all wrong.

[Ammi]

...I don’t know the legality but it was said at the time that he was strongly advised not to do the interview because in doing it, it would mean that he would no longer have his right to diplomatic immunity...

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

For all of those saying he hasn’t been found guilty of anything then why is he not cooperating with the investigation?

Can someone care to answer this please.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...my skin is the perfect thickness, Jet...your passive aggressiveness is not so perfect, though...as you can imagine if it were being aimed at you...I’d appreciate it if you don’t direct it to me at all, when it isn’t necessary or justified...

It often is by many, I don't complain every time though.
Can you explain to me what is passive aggressive about saying 'Come on Ammi'?
It was a reaction to how I felt about your words. Now I feel I need to tread carefully around you and react to you differently than to everyone else. Fine, If that's what you need.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Can someone care to answer this please.

I'm wondering the same thing tbh , but I guess because he's PRINCE Andrew he's untouchable.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

His age is relevant to the point that a 90+ year old woman is hardly going to grab her 61 year old son by the scruff of the neck and drag him kicking and screaming in a car and take him to a police station...
The U.S say they have asked him to cooperate but it’s been denied by the Palace...he could I guess be sopaenad and if he does then we will be sure to know about it.

*sigh*

Nobody is expecting the Queen to take him down to the local police station like a mum that's found out their kid robbed someone's garden gnome and wants to give him a scare.

The palace are blatantly protecting him though and lying, people have gone on TV multiple times to say that he was asked to help investigations and he still hasn't and most likely will never help until he is forced to do so.

[parmnion]

You only have to post a link to Andrew's interview to see what everyone thought about him..

This is new..

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Jet why do you ignore the fact Andrew was best pals with a notorious rapist, guilty or innocent the person doesn't have a leg to stand on . Be honest now .

You do know he knew meghan as well yeah.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Scarlett.

You can't tell me you saw the interview, with the man lying out of his backside, and believed him?

Can you point out to me where I said I believed him? Honestly, read what is actually said instead of making things up.

[parmnion]

What are we supposed to be comparing amy jade?

[parmnion]

Ah ok ..andrew v meghan and harry..

Andrew's an obvious creep, a paedo..one who harry looked up to and judging by the old photos we have seen off him out his tits, one probably influenced by his uncle.


He goes on to marry a ****e actress, one his senior, one married before.. one obviously given roles cause shes done the casting couch..

3 immoral waste of spaces in one way or another.