[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

You had no context.. it was a random statement you made with nothing to back it up.

I've spoken to many at work who think just that.. you insisting they are aware doesn't mean they are. I've given you an example of those who think it's fine and acceptable but for some reason you aren't able to process that.

I haven't suggested I'm in an enlightened few.. you're suggesting everyone is enlightened and they are aware of the damage they are doing.. for the last time the guys I've spoke to don't see it as damage at all.

It did have context. AGAIN, it was in response to Caprimint. Why it's so difficult for you to comprehend I have NO idea.

"People at work have takeaways and drink booze" =/= that "people" think that doing that is not unhealthy.

I've not suggested everyone is enlightened, I've suggested people are aware of what is and is not good for them (in general) not everyone is educated on food and lifestyles but general alcohol/takeaways=bad is an obvious one. But we as humans will just make a decision based on our own pleasures and whether we find the possible consequences a risk worth taking or not. That's not enlightened in the slightest.

Your conclusion that 'person eats takeaway = person doesn't understand how unhealthy it is' just does not work.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It did have context. AGAIN, it was in response to Caprimint. Why it's so difficult for you to comprehend I have NO idea.

"People at work have takeaways and drink booze" =/= that "people" think that doing that is not unhealthy.

I've not suggested everyone is enlightened, I've suggested people are aware of what is and is not good for them (in general) not everyone is educated on food and lifestyles but general alcohol/takeaways=bad is an obvious one. But we as humans will just make a decision based on our own pleasures and whether we find the possible consequences a risk worth taking or not. That's not enlightened in the slightest.

Your conclusion that 'person eats takeaway = person doesn't understand how unhealthy it is' just does not work.

It's not a conclusion it's a result of actual conversations you insisting they are aware is not my experience talking to them. Bang on that they must all you like...

I'm aware who you were quoting, the comment was given no context imo.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It's not a conclusion it's a result of actual conversations you insisting they are aware is not my experience talking to them. Bang on that they must all you like...

I'm aware who you were quoting, the comment was given no context imo.

It was? The post I responded to that something doesn't have to be long term to be dangerous. You assumed I was stating juicing is dangerous. I wasn't.

I don't care what your co-workers think or do, my point is using them as proof that people who do xyz do not know abc is incorrect.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It was? The post I responded to that something doesn't have to be long term to be dangerous. You assumed I was stating juicing is dangerous. I wasn't.

I don't care what your co-workers think or do, my point is using them as proof that people who do xyz do not know abc is incorrect.

Right so how does that work then? Are my Co workers not people?.. :/

I asked you many times what you were referring to and got nothing back.. no context whatsoever.
I haven't assumed anything.

It's clear you don't want to explain what you were referring to or you can't.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Right so how does that work then? Are my Co workers not people?.. :/

I asked you many times what you were referring to and got nothing back.. no context whatsoever.
I haven't assumed anything.

It's clear you don't want to explain what you were referring to or you can't.

Don't want or can't?

It's literally there for you to read.

Caprimint said "Kizzy isn't planning on doing it forever..." as a reason it is fine. I simply responded that something doesn't have to be permanent/long term to be dangerous. So "not doing it forever" isn't a good reason for ANYTHING to be seen as fine.

You took that to mean I was stating outright that juicing is dangerous. I corrected you.

Really not sure what needs to be explained. It's LITERALLY self explanatory.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Don't want or can't?

It's literally there for you to read.

Caprimint said "Kizzy isn't planning on doing it forever..." as a reason it is fine. I simply responded that something doesn't have to be permanent/long term to be dangerous. So "not doing it forever" isn't a good reason for ANYTHING to be seen as fine.

You took that to mean I was stating outright that juicing is dangerous. I corrected you.

Really not sure what needs to be explained. It's LITERALLY self explanatory.

So you were talking abut juicing... you were mocking me earlier for 'assuming' you were?

Caprimints comment you quoted specifically referred to me and juicing :/
As I said you could have at any time clarified that you did or didn't feel it was dangerous short term and the conversation go from there...but you chose not to.

Anyhoo your I've pandered to the pedant in you too long, I do not want this thread closing because you failed to get your point across adequately.