[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Abra

Where did I say that "gay has always been used negatively in every single conversation and scenario across the UK"? It would be easier to debate with you if you weren't just making things up and we were actually debating on the same intellectual level. If you really want to act like there's a chance that Kerry's use of the word had no connotations to the internationally recognised modern definition of the word gay you're completely delusional.

"A term of endearment"

Nothing more out of touch than a straight person trying to educate a gay person on what is or isn't homophobic, when you're actually just imposing your own ignorance. Your masked slipped a bit with that "grinches" comment though, no wonder you're so eager to defend homophobia. Birds of a feather and all

Yes, we can do without personal abuse thank you very much.

[Abra]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Yes, we can do without personal abuse thank you very much.

Then you should probably refrain from referring to gay people as "grinches", unless you are comfortable with being a hypocrite.

[Cherry Christmas]

I feel like I know you Abra? have you posted under a different name previously?

[Abra]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I feel like I know you Abra? have you posted under a different name previously?

Not that I recall - who do I remind you of?

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Abra

Then you should probably refrain from referring to gay people as "grinches", unless you are comfortable with being a hypocrite.

Ok grinchy. Whatever you and your snowflakes say.

[Abra]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Ok grinchy. Whatever you and your snowflakes say.

Sure, I'm the snowflake, not the one crying about the fact that the word gay means something different than it did 100 years ago. Put down the Daily Mail and turn off GB News, Karen

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Abra

Sure, I'm the snowflake, not the one crying about the fact that the word gay means something different than it did 100 years ago. Put down the Daily Mail and turn off GB News, Karen

Oh, I wasnt crying...

You could never make me do that. I was merely telling a gay person that they stole the word then got all teary because it can get used to describe negative things endearingly... boohoo, poor gay man thinks words belongs to him

[Abra]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Oh, I wasnt crying...

You could never make me do that. I was merely telling a gay person that they stole the word then got all teary because it can get used to describe negative things endearingly... boohoo, poor gay man thinks words belongs to him

Keep going love, get out all that rage you have for the gays Hopefully you'll feel better

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Abra

Keep going love, get out all that rage you have for the gays Hopefully you'll feel better

I'd rather just put you on ignore tbh...are you a lesbian by any chance?

[Garfie]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Oh, I wasnt crying...

You could never make me do that. I was merely telling a gay person that they stole the word then got all teary because it can get used to describe negative things endearingly... boohoo, poor gay man thinks words belongs to him

If you had an understanding of the etymology of language you would know that words are not ‘stolen’, that thousands of words change their meanings over time, and that this is just one of many. An example would be the word ‘pretty’ which was originally used to describe a man, and meant ‘clever’. And the truth is, few people born after 1970 would ever use the word ‘gay’ as a way of saying happy, and it’s use in that way has been practically obsolete for decades.

Your comments towards Abra are now coming across as goading and aimed at insulting or upsetting, rather than making valid points. That doesn’t make for a strong argument on your part. Come on, Parmi - I know from the past you are so much better than that.

[Ammi]

…great posts, Garfie……also just to add that there would probably be derogatory terms/expressions for those with a limited mobility/medical condition and disease etc that Kerry would find offensive…

…words/expressions do change over time especially when they’ve become and been used and attached negatively…how we refer to travellers for instance is another term that’s changed over time …Kerry’s use with the word was rightfully addressed, I feel…

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by Garfie

Your comments towards Abra are now coming across as goading and aimed at insulting or upsetting, rather than making valid points.

Interesting that you only point out one of the posters here doing that and not the other.

Originally Posted by Garfie

I don’t think this is about LGBTQ+ as such, but about using language appropriate to the 2020s.

Yes, the conversation here is partly about who gets to control the language and decide if it is 'appropriate' or not. I just don't recognise your or others' right to do that.

It is also about context and intent.

And it is also about the use of dangerous and very serious words like 'homophobic' incorrectly in an attempt to damage others in a very real way in their real lives.

Those kinds of terms can result in a person getting publically harassed or assaulted by nutjobs or losing their job, just because they used an outdated term in a way that you don't like. That, to me, is not right.

Originally Posted by Garfie

The reality of the times is that the use of the word ‘gay’ as a way of insulting people is publicly acknowledged as homophobic language. The fact is, if the word wasn’t perceived as transphobic, BB wouldn’t have felt the need to reprimand Kerry and demand that she issue an apology.

The public is not a monolith, we don't all perceive this in the same way and so we do not all publically acknowledge that, no.

'Homophobe' to a lot out here is (rightly in my view) seen as something far more serious than the one off use of an outdated word. It means the active dislike or hatred of gay people, neither of which Kerry has shown.

I am not saying anyone has to like the way that she used the word. All I am saying that going right to the nuclear option of calling her a 'homophobe' (and now, somehow, a 'transphobe') for it is not the way.

How on earth has she shown herself to be 'transphobic'? It's getting nuts.

In my view, the 'phobe' terms are used way too easily and too casually considering their destructive power. It often comes across as a spiteful and malicious attempt to destroy the life of the other person, something often far worse often than the original 'crime'.

Look, if BB thought it was that serious Kelly would have been removed right away, like Emily was when she said the N word. The fact that she wasn't tells us that BB didn't think it was that bad and that an apology would do (even though we know an apology is NEVER enough in these situations for those who choose to be offended).

If BB actually agreed with you that it was actually 'homophobic' she would be gone instead of being warned and forced to apologise simply to appease a loud minority.