Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramid*
If it is regarded that Aaron was drunk, that is concluded as being not in control of his actions or thoughts then and therefore, the agreement in nul and void. Now, I'll play fair here and apply this same logic therefore to when Jay said Aaron could have his money - since Jay had been drinking that night. Let's say Jay was drunk, same rules apply.
So it's back to the Winner Take All re the £50k, with the other £50k being split as the 5 winners agreed upon.
|
I thought Jay did the switch during the following day? However, I think your reasoning is sound. Split the £50k, winner gets the other £50k.
Everyone lives another day.
Threaded Mode