[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?!

Oh I agree 100%, it's a sham alright

Originally Posted by Niamh.

You got all that from a smiley?

Because I fail to see how not staying in touch is a "sham" that doesn't even make sense. Shame does. Simples.

No.... I got it from the part where you said, rather caustic in tone,

Nope, it's an indication that I agree with MTVNs view, is that alright with you?

Because his comment was less to do with people staying in touch (ie due to frienship)... I feel it was more to do with staying in touch - to share the winnings.... hence why he said SHAM.

As for saying 'sham' doesn't even make sense - it appears even the fm, Jo1791 even is prepared to accept that what Jay said, could have been meant as in SHAM, not SHAME.

I find it quite strange that you cannot accept another fms opinion, even though you may not agree with it.
.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Oh I agree 100%, it's a sham alright




Because his comment was less to do with people staying in touch (ie due to frienship)... I feel it was more to do with staying in touch - to share the winnings.... hence why he said SHAM.

As for saying 'sham' doesn't even make sense - it appears even the fm, Jo1791 even is prepared to accept that what Jay said, could have been meant as in SHAM, not SHAME.

I find it quite strange that you cannot accept another fms opinion, even though you may not agree with it.
.

Do you now.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Do you now.

yes. After all, I did think that it was regarded very much that we can disagree till the cows come home, but that other fms opinions were still to be respected - whether those opinions are shared or not.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

yes. After all, I did think that it was regarded very much that we can disagree till the cows come home, but that other fms opinions were still to be respected - whether those opinions are shared or not.

Indeed.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Indeed.

Nice to see that we do agree on that.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Nice to see that we do agree on that.

Oh, you crack me up Pyramid.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Oh, you crack me up Pyramid.

Eggcellent.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Yes I did but I realise that a lot of diciphering is required when reading Jays tweets and 'shame' is the word that makes the most sense. But the whole Alex not spitting the cash is a sham!!!!

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Oh I agree 100%, it's a sham alright

Yes you did, and made no mention of the 'shame' making more sense in that particular post....that post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay did mean to type SHAM.

You will find that I also agree with the latter part, as stated in my post above.

[Scotty07]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Yes you did, and made no mention of the 'shame' making more sense in that particular post....that post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay did mean to type SHAM.

You will find that I also agree with the latter part, as stated in my post above.

Personally I couldn't careless whether Jay meant "Shame" or "Sham", but I've really enjoyed reading this thread. Good for you Pyramid, for sticking to what you believe to be the truth.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Yes you did, and made no mention of the 'shame' making more sense in that particular post....that post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay did mean to type SHAM.

You will find that I also agree with the latter part, as stated in my post above.

I know what I think thank you muchly

When a sentence begins....EVEN IF....hypothetical dear

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Yes you did, and made no mention of the 'shame' making more sense in that particular post....that post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay did mean to type SHAM.

You will find that I also agree with the latter part, as stated in my post above.

Originally Posted by jo1791

I know what I think thank you muchly

When a sentence begins....EVEN IF....hypothetical dear

Oh I know it was hypothetical, dear. Just as (as I stated earlier -see post above) - that that particular post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay DID mean to type SHAM.


Here is your post again: It's very easy to read. It very clearly stated that you are accepting the possibility - not only do you say that, you go on to say that you would understand why he would.

Originally Posted by jo1791
Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?!

My work here is done methinks: best part is: Jay /Lou are still minus their £1k hopefully.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Oh I know it was hypothetical, dear. Just as (as I stated earlier -see post above) - that that particular post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay DID mean to type SHAM.


Here is your post again: It's very easy to read. It very clearly stated that you are accepting the possibility - not only do you say that, you go on to say that you would understand why he would.



My work here is done methinks: best part is: Jay /Lou are still minus their £1k hopefully.

Thanks for requoting my post, I am well aware of the reasoning to my posts and don't need you to twist my reasoning. I was merely pointing out that regardless of the word, Jay wasn't bitching, which is what you accused him of...dear

I certainly wasn't in agreement with your stance that he meant 'sham' and not 'shame' as it doesn't make sense

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Thanks for requoting my post, I am well aware of the reasoning to my posts and don't need you to twist my reasoning. I was merely pointing out that regardless of the word, Jay wasn't bitching, which is what you accused him of...dear

I certainly wasn't in agreement with your stance that he meant 'sham' and not 'shame' as it doesn't make sense

I didn't have to twist anything. You very clearly wrote what you did. What you meant was very clear to understand - and that was, that you were prepared to consider that Jay may have used the word SHAM deliberately.

Anyhow, now that has been cleared up - I'll bid you a lovely day.....dear.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I didn't have to twist anything. You very clearly wrote what you did. What you meant was very clear to understand - and that was, that you were prepared to consider that Jay may have used the word SHAM deliberately.

Anyhow, now that has been cleared up - I'll bid you a lovely day.....dear.

Do learn to be gracious dear, I know what I meant now run off and accept it