[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Can I suggest you don't take things so personally and sensitively in future then

Can I suggest you accept other's opinions without attempting to berate and dismiss said opinions in future then.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Can I suggest you accept other's opinions without attempting to berate and dismiss said opinions in future then.

Tbf, you are just as guilty for dismissing other's opinions, even when they are based on fact

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Tbf, you are just as guilty for dismissing other's opinions, even when they are based on fact

Not at all. I am happy to accept another viewpoint. Not agreeing with it is an entirely different matter altogether.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Not at all. I am happy to accept another viewpoint. Not agreeing with it is an entirely different matter altogether.

But not agreeing with your view point is seen as dismissing it?

I have no problem accepting other's opinions over my own when the evidence is staring at me in the face.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

But not agreeing with your view point is seen as dismissing it?

I have no problem accepting other's opinions over my own when the evidence is staring at me in the face.

Talking of evidence staring people in the face..... that word.. 'SHAM' - that's a perfect example of my very point - and one in which you alluded to yourself. so yes, even when there is very clear evidence staring at me, that evidence being what Jay himself tweeted, I can accept other may feel Jay mistyped and actually meant SHAME. That's plausible. My view is as equally plausible.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Talking of evidence staring people in the face..... that word.. 'SHAM' - that's a perfect example of my very point - and one in which you alluded to yourself. so yes, even when there is very clearl evidence staring at me, that evidence being what Jay himsef tweeted, I can accept other may feel Jay mistyped and actually meant SHAME. That's plausible. My view is as equally plausible.

No I didn't allude to it, read my post and I started with 'Even if'. 'Shame' makes more sense.

And there have been other quibbles on here where you have been faced with facts and you still won't accept that your opinion might be wrong..when you yourself cannot back up your opinions...

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

No I didn't allude to it, read my post and I started with 'Even if'. 'Shame' makes more sense.

And there have been other quibbles on here where you have been faced with facts and you still won't accept that your opinion might be wrong..when you yourself cannot back up your opinions...

You most certainly indicated that it was plausible. Moreso, you stated that you would completely understand WHY he'd say that.

I don't believe I have said anyone is wrong to have their opinion, different as it may be to my own.

Originally Posted by jo1791
Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?!