[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Talking of evidence staring people in the face..... that word.. 'SHAM' - that's a perfect example of my very point - and one in which you alluded to yourself. so yes, even when there is very clearl evidence staring at me, that evidence being what Jay himsef tweeted, I can accept other may feel Jay mistyped and actually meant SHAME. That's plausible. My view is as equally plausible.

No I didn't allude to it, read my post and I started with 'Even if'. 'Shame' makes more sense.

And there have been other quibbles on here where you have been faced with facts and you still won't accept that your opinion might be wrong..when you yourself cannot back up your opinions...

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

No I didn't allude to it, read my post and I started with 'Even if'. 'Shame' makes more sense.

And there have been other quibbles on here where you have been faced with facts and you still won't accept that your opinion might be wrong..when you yourself cannot back up your opinions...

You most certainly indicated that it was plausible. Moreso, you stated that you would completely understand WHY he'd say that.

I don't believe I have said anyone is wrong to have their opinion, different as it may be to my own.

Originally Posted by jo1791
Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?!

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

You most certainly indicated that it was plausible. Moreso, you stated that you would completely understand WHY he'd say that.

Yes I did but I realise that a lot of diciphering is required when reading Jays tweets and 'shame' is the word that makes the most sense. But the whole Alex not spitting the cash is a sham!!!!