[the truth]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

I'm sorry, I may be wrong but you seem to be under the delusion that this show is about music?

And name me one TV star who isn't "vastly overpaid", that's the industry. None of them actually deserve the megabucks they get even if they're talented at what they do.

But, hey, life's a bitch.

I disagree......tom Jessie danny and will earn the money the market demands as people buy their music and their tickets etc
holly is paid by the tax payers by the tax funded BBC for £420000 for doing almost nothing....its crazy....and yes I do believe the show is meant to be about the not a talentless overpaid presenter who adds nothing and knows nothing about music

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by the truth

I disagree......tom Jessie danny and will earn the money the market demands as people buy their music and their tickets etc
holly is paid by the tax payers by the tax funded BBC for £420000 for doing almost nothing....its crazy....and yes I do believe the show is meant to be about the not a talentless overpaid presenter who adds nothing and knows nothing about music

Actually, they too are paid by the tax payer in their fee for being on the show.

Jessie J giving advice to budding musicians when she has all of one album and no longevity under her belt. You could rip apart the credibility of this show on every level.

And, yes people buy their music, does it mean that their talent deserves millions and millions? No. As another poster said, doctors and nurses who save lives everyday deserve it more. But that's life, it's not always fair.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

Actually, they too are paid by the tax payer in their fee for being on the show.

Jessie J giving advice to budding musicians when she has all of one album and no longevity under her belt. You could rip apart the credibility of this show on every level.

And, yes people buy their music, does it mean that their talent deserves millions and millions? No. As another poster said, doctors and nurses who save lives everyday deserve it more. But that's life, it's not always fair.

wrong....the 4 judges have experience singing, dancing, performing, entertaining millions of music fans, working alongside musicians, creating songs, music, videos etc etc

Willoughby has none of this knowledge or experience

heck tom used to present , sing solo, duets and do the monologues all on his own on his 1970s tv shows.....and they were terrific.....no wooden presenter in sight

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by the truth

wrong....the 4 judges have experience singing, dancing, performing, entertaining millions of music fans, working alongside musicians, creating songs, music, videos etc etc

Willoughby has none of this knowledge or experience

heck tom used to present , sing solo, duets and do the monologues all on his own on his 1970s tv shows.....and they were terrific.....no wooden presenter in sight

a) I never said the 4 judges didn't do all of those things, but do I believe those things deserves millions in return? No.

But I'll also point out plenty popstars have done the things you listed and are worthless crap with no talent. So, even more, they don't deserve the money either.

b) The presenter doesn't need a knowledge of music, they stand there for a couple of minutes at a time giving out the phone numbers and introducing the acts. No music knowledge required.