[the truth]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Really because I believe BB should have stepped in when he went outside to Hazel and told her BB had told her she had to go to bed.

She asked if that was true which he then swore it was on his kids lives when he was lying.

That should have sent off warning signs.

He was the one who forced her into the situation, she was outside talking to Charlie and he was the one who made her go to bed.

she was keeping him awake, again your bias chooses to ignore this. sleep deprivation is cruel and bullying. then she took his bed clothes, jumped on him and demanded hugs etc all designed to humiliate him and destroy his relationship outside. all factors you choose to ignore because youre biased

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by the truth

she was keeping him awake, again your bias chooses to ignore this. sleep deprivation is cruel and bullying. then she took his bed clothes, jumped on him and demanded hugs etc all designed to humiliate him and destroy his relationship outside. all factors you choose to ignore because youre biased

They're in the BB house, not having absolute quiet comes with the territory.......... also her and Charlie were almost whispering

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by the truth

she was keeping him awake, again your bias chooses to ignore this. sleep deprivation is cruel and bullying. then she took his bed clothes, jumped on him and demanded hugs etc all designed to humiliate him and destroy his relationship outside. all factors you choose to ignore because youre biased

He went to bed an hour before.

She was outside talking to Charlie so why did he have to have her to go to bed for him to sleep?

BB turned the lights off for him and closed the shutters.

IHe told her she had to go to bed and swore on his childs life and you're supporting that?