[Nedusa]

Originally Posted by GypsyGoth

You are mistaken, I am not wrong at all, where you and Nedusa see strength in the wishy washy way he's handled this, I see it for what it is.

What I want from the situation is for peace to happen. But that's not what my comment was about, I was referring to Obama's lack of decisiveness.

From my understanding russia & syria are allies, the notion that russia are doing this for the good of the US is incorrect.

And you left out stuff about Obama, like how the egyptian army are bankrolled by his government, they get about 1 billion a year from his government, this army recently overthrew the democratically elected president.

Also you left out how people have been locked up by Obama without trial and are still imprisoned by him, he has the power to release them.

Obama is just as much a warmonger as Bush was, but one of the differences is that Bush would have been decisive over this syrian thing.

No..... Obama is nothing like Bush... Bush was a cretin, stupidest man ever to hold the office of President of the United States of America. Starting war after war after war and sacrificing thousands of American servicemen not to mention the hundreds of thousands of innocent victims was never the actions of a sensible, rational president .

Obama at least tries to pursue a policy of least use of force or force as a LAST resort not a first resort like Bush. I agree Obama has not handled the present crises from the front but you could argue Syrian disarmament of chemical weapons has resulted from the threat of use of force.

This has to make The US ultimately look as if they have achieved Syria's abandonment of Chemical weapons as a personal triumph for the current US administration.