[bots]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Linking to the security criteria suggests that I have some pre-knowledge of Corbyn that would violate that criteria enough to make me personally feel like he is a realistic security threat? I'm asking for links to a reliable analysis of Corbyn in security terms that actually makes him seem like a risk.

From what I know of Corbyn, he is clearly not a REALISTIC security risk, whether there would be flags on the official criteria or not. When people are being security vetted I would assume they stay heavily on the side of caution.

Being an affiliate or member of risk groups is an automatic fail. So, with his current associations he would fail, that's without even looking at anything historical.

Anyway, i'm done with this, if people don't want to accept information that is their right of course