[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Being an affiliate or member of risk groups is an automatic fail. So, with his current associations he would fail, that's without even looking at anything historical.

Anyway, i'm done with this, if people don't want to accept information that is their right of course

Yes but I'm not asking whether or not he would fail because of his affiliation with those groups, as I fully believe that his affiliation with those groups was with a view to promoting peace, not promoting violence.

I'm not interested in technicalities that mean he would be an "automatic fail" I'm asking for some sort of evidence that he supports violence, wants to further terrorism, and is a realistic risk to the public.

You're not giving me any information beyond that to "accept" or otherwise?