[Gusto Brunt]

Originally Posted by Samm

you rang up a day later for an extra 29p BYE

I think you're failing to see the issue here. It's not about the 29p. It's about a store saying something costs one amount but in fact it's another amount.

Like Old Granny Johnson going down there, seeing her favourite cakes are 3 for £1.50 and ending up paying £3 for them at the till. She hands over money and doesn't look at the receipt. Do you get it now???

It's standing up for what's right.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Gusto Brunt

I think you're failing to see the issue here. It's not about the 29p. It's about a store saying something costs one amount but in fact it's another amount.

Like Old Granny Johnson going down there, seeing her favourite cakes are 3 for £1.50 and ending up paying £3 for them at the till. She hands over money and doesn't look at the receipt. Do you get it now???

It's standing up for what's right.

I think people fail to see that if a lot of customers are charged 29p more than they should be charged, that could add up to a significant amount that the shop, or even an employee, would pocket. It's basically theft.