[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by jet

Of course concessions and diplomacy are better ways, and you obviously still believe this is what he was doing despite all the evidence to the contrary of his sympathy and patronage of the IRA. You just ignore the numerous sources and the people who knew of him and his activities in this country before some people here were even born.
Tony Blair was very active in peace talks with the IRA, so was Margaret Thatcher, but were they ever seen attending a funereal for an IRA terrorist? Did they attend rallies and give speeches commemorating the IRA dead? Were they pals with numerous IRA men who at the time were bombing the UK mainland? Corbyn was, and you can forget about the idea that he was in any way important to the peace process, he was not. He even was against the first attempt at peace with the Anglo Irish Agreement.
I have no idea if he is a threat anymore, but he's certainly not the kind of person I would want as my Prime Minister.
The way this country is going we'll have an Isis supporting Prime Minister in 40 years time. But as long as they promise more dosh in our wallets, it's all good.
But you believe what you believe and there is no point in trying to change your mind or anyone else's. So peace to all and have a good day.

I think people already have their concerns on whether we already have an ISIS supporter on our hands. Given his past history with the IRA, his refusal to clarify this issue and his open border policies - it is something to think about. Hasn't there also been some evidence of him attending ISIS rallies/funerals? I seem to remember seeing something.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politi...olitical-views

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ed-expressing/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...errorists.html

Terrorist sympathizing seems to be a hobby of his.