[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Eh? It is wrong though. You made a big deal of saying its nothing to do with pride? Now you're insisting it was homophobic when it may or may not have been. Unless you can read minds now. You've destroyed your own argument.

No no. I said the bench has nothing to do with pride. It was vandalised by an idiot that thought it was. You see homophobes don’t have much upstairs in terms of intelligence.
It’s pretty easy to see why it was vandalised. That much is evident.

Obviously not for some

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

No no. I said the bench has nothing to do with pride. It was vandalised by an idiot that thought it was. You see homophobes don’t have much upstairs in terms of intelligence.
It’s pretty easy to see why it was vandalised. That much is evident.

Obviously not for some

Oh I see, you know exactly what was in this morons mind then? Silly me. I'm not saying it's not highly likely, I do agree with it being very probable but not so daft as to announce it as fact like you have.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Oh I see, you know exactly what was in this morons mind then? Silly me. I'm not saying it's not highly likely, I do agree with it being very probable but not so daft as to announce it as fact like you have.

That’s the privilege of having critical thought

[Niamh.]

It's far more likely to have been someone who was homophobic than someone who just prefers to sit on a black bench...............imo

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It's far more likely to have been someone who was homophobic than someone who just prefers to sit on a black bench...............imo

I mean it’s pretty obvious

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

I mean it’s pretty obvious

I never realised actually that the Rainbow flag had one less colour than the actual rainbow, everyday's a school day

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It's far more likely to have been someone who was homophobic than someone who just prefers to sit on a black bench...............imo

This.

[Glenn.]

It’s not cynical to state the obvious

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

It’s not cynical to state the obvious

Still isn't a fact.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Still isn't a fact.

More likely to be fact than anything else though

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

More likely to be fact than anything else though

Yes, I said that

[bots]

Personally, I blame Irving, he is the most likely culprit

[Kate!]

Oh so it's unacceptable for myself and others to say it was highly likely to be a muslim but totally fine for Glenn to say it was definitely 100% certainty to be homophobic. You see the difference?

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Oh so it's unacceptable for myself and others to say it was highly likely to be a muslim but totally fine for Glenn to say it was definitely 100% certainty to be homophobic. You see the difference?

The only people that have said otherwise are the ones triggered by the very flag the homophobe thought it was when they painted over it.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

The only people that have said otherwise are the ones triggered by the very flag the homophobe thought it was when they painted over it.

I didn't say otherwise. I said it was highly probable but not a fact.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Oh so it's unacceptable for myself and others to say it was highly likely to be a muslim but totally fine for Glenn to say it was definitely 100% certainty to be homophobic. You see the difference?

Yes, one is using something that actually happened to come to a likely conclusion on motivation, the other is blaming a specific demographic for no reason.

One does no harm, the other perpetuates racial division based on nothing.

[bots]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Yes, one is using something that actually happened to come to a likely conclusion on motivation, the other is blaming a specific demographic for no reason.

but its not raising a flag without reason though is it, when it's built into a particular demograhics religion

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by bots

but its not raising a flag without reason though is it, when it's built into a particular demograhics religion

Exactly. It's just as likely it was a muslim.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by bots

but its not raising a flag without reason though is it, when it's built into a particular demograhics religion

But it's needless, because there is no evidence it was religiously motivated, so it's all just finger-pointing. Again, you're focusing on the statistics of that demographic's religion which ignoring the statistics surrounding the demographic in the town it took place, which once again I will state is almost 99% white and made up of basically Catholics and Atheists.

According to the latest Census, the number of Muslim residents are: 71, compared to over 9,000 Christians and 12,000 atheists, just to put that into context.

With this in mind, and as stats are so important to you, do you not think it' wild you're prepared to point the finger at a group that make up 0.2% of the towns population without just cause. Does that not strike you as a weird thing to do?

[bots]

Originally Posted by BBXX

But it's needless, because there is no evidence it was religiously motivated, so it's all just finger-pointing. Again, you're focusing on the statistics of that demographic's religion which ignoring the statistics surrounding the demographic in the town it took place, which once again I will state is almost 99% white and made up of basically Catholics and Atheists.

According to the latest Census, the number of Muslim residents are: 71, compared to over 9,000 Christians and 12,000 atheists, just to put that into context.

With this in mind, and as stats are so important to you, do you not think it' wild you're prepared to point the finger at a group that make up 0.2% of the towns population without just cause. Does that not strike you as a weird thing to do?

Atheists don't give a crap about anything spiritual and Christians are pretty accepting of most things, so you would seem to be destroying your own argument

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Yes, one is using something that actually happened to come to a likely conclusion on motivation, the other is blaming a specific demographic for no reason.

One does no harm, the other perpetuates racial division based on nothing.

[Glenn.]

So still homophobic then

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

So still homophobic then

Sigh, yes I said that several times. Stop going on. No matter what we think it is only probably the case. Not fact. Why so hell bent on saying it is.

[Glenn.]

Those damn statistics huh

[Glenn.]

The mental gymnastics on display here are Olympic